Skip to main content Skip to page footer
elni logo elni logo

Waste, Product and By-product in EU Waste Law

Carlos da Silva Campos

elni Review 2007, Issue 2,  pp. 28-44. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2007.014

The European Parliament voted to include a “by-product” definition in the Waste Framework Directive. A few days later, the Commission came up with an “Interpretative Communication”. The purpose of this article is to find a way of exploring the “new” definition of by-products in order to find more utility than disturbance.

Access full article

References

  1. Julius von Kirchmann (1848), Die Wertlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft. Manutius Verlag, Heidelberg, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/002268806779166732.  
  2. Commission of the European Communities, 2005, Proposal for a Directive Of The European Parliament And Of The Council on waste (COM(2005)0667 – C6-0009/2006 – 2005/0281(COD)).
  3. Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 2007, Mitteilung der Kommission an den Rat und das Europäische Parlament, zur Mitteilung zu Auslegungsfragen betreffend Abfall und Nebenprodukte, KOM(2007) 50 endgültig.
  4. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (68 Stat. 923) (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.).
  5. Code of Federal Regulations, Su-Ch. I, Part 243(1995).
  6. Stephan Tromans (2001), EC Waste Law – A Complete Mess?, in Journal of Environmental Law (Oxford University Press), Vol. 13,2, pp. 133-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/13.2.133.
  7. Jurgen Fluck (1994), The Term Waste in EU Law, European Environmental Law Review, 79, 81.
  8. Llona Cheyne, M. Purdue (1995), Fitting Definition to Purpose: the Search for a Satisfactory Definition of Waste, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol 7, 2, pp. 149-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/7.2.149.
  9. Geert van Carlster (1997), The EC definition of Waste: The Euro Tombesi Bypass and the Basel Relief Routes, European Business Law Review, May-June 1997, pp. 137-143.
  10. Laurent Bontoux, Fabio Leone (1997), The legal definition of waste and its impact on waste management in Europe, EUR 17716 EN, European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Sevilla.
  11. Ilona Cheyne (2002), The Definition of Waste in EC Law, Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 14, pp. 61-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/14.1.61.
  12. Rosalind Malcom and Rosalind Clift (2002), Barriers to Industrial Ecology: The Strange Case of The Tombesi Bypass, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol 6,1, pp. 4-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819802320971588.
  13. Eva Pongrácz (2002), Re-defining the Concepts of Waste and Waste Management, Academic dissertation/Univ of Oulu.
  14. David Pocklington (2003), Opening Pandora’s Box: The EU Review of the Definition of Waste, European Environmental Law Review, Vol 12, 7, p. 204-215.
  15. Ludwig. Krämer (2003), The Distinction between Product and Waste in Community Law, Environmental Liability, vol. II, n° 1, pp. 3-14.
  16. Ludwig. Krämer (2003), Member State’s environmental legislation and the application of EC Waste law-the classification of waste, Environmental Liability, 2003, vol. 11, n° 6, pp. 231-233.
  17. Nicolas de Sadeleer (2005), Waste, Products and By-products, Journal of European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 1, n° 4, pp. 46-58.
  18. Nicolas de Sadeleer (2005), EC Waste Law or How to Juggle with Legal Concepts Drawing the Line between Waste, Residues, Secondary Materials, By-Products, Disposal and Recovery Operations, in Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 6/2005, pp. 458-476. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2293365.
  19. Geert van Calster (2006) If ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Commission efforts to manage the definitions of waste, recycling and Recovery, and to switch from a waste streams to a materials approach, in elni review, 1-2/2006, pp. 18-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2006.004.
  20. Vincent Brown et al (2006), The Legal Definition of Waste in the European Court of Justice – The Problem and the Law, Semple Fraser, Glasgow.
  21. Laurent Bontoux, Fabio Leone (1997), The legal definition of waste and its impact on waste management in Europe, EUR 17716 EN, European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Sevilla.
  22. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Erste Kammer) vom 28. März 1990. Strafverfahren gegen G. Vessoso und G. Zanetti. Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Prétura di Asti - Italien. Abfälle - Begriff. Verbundene Rechtssachen C-206/88 und C-207/88.
  23. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Erste Kammer) vom 28. März 1990. Strafverfahren gegen E. Zanetti u. a. Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Prétura di San Vito al Tagliamento - Italien. Abfälle - Begriff - Genehmigung und Überwachung der Beseitigung von Abfällen. Rechtssache C-359/88.
  24. Urteil des Gerichtshofes vom 10. Mai 1995. Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften gegen Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Vertragsverletzung - Umsetzung der Richtlinien über Abfälle, über giftige und gefährliche Abfälle und über die grenzüberschreitende Verbringung gefährlicher Abfälle. Rechtssache C-422/92.
  25. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 1997. Criminal proceedings against Euro Tombesi and Adino Tombesi (C-304/94), Roberto Santella (C-330/94), Giovanni Muzi and others (C-342/94) and Anselmo Savini (C-224/95). Reference for a preliminary ruling: Pretura circondariale di Terni - Italy. Waste - Definition - Council Directives 91/156/EEC and 91/689/EEC - Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93. Joined cases C-304/94, C-330/94, C-342/94 and C-224/95.
  26. Judgment of the Court of 18 December 1997. Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL v Région wallonne. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Conseil d'Etat - Belgium. Directive 91/156/EEC - Period for transposition - Effects - Definition of waste. Case C-129/96.
  27. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 April 2002. Palin Granit Oy and Vehmassalon kansanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland. Harmonisation of laws - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Concept of 'waste - Production residue - Quarry - Storage - Use of waste - No risk to health or the environment - Possibility of recovery of waste. Case C-9/00.
  28. Geert van Carlster (1997), The EC Definition of Waste: The Euro Tombesi Bypass and the Basel Relief Routes, European Business Law Review, May-June 1997, pp. 137-143.
  29. OECD Waste Management Policy Group (1998), Final Guidance Document for Distinguishing Waste From Non-Waste, ENV/epOC/WMP(98)/Rev 1, Paris, 23-24 April, 1998.
  30. Jurgen Fluck (1994), The Term Waste in EU Law, European Law Review, 79, 81.
  31. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 June 2000. ARCO Chemie Nederland Ltd v Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (C-418/97) and Vereniging Dorpsbelang Hees, Stichting Werkgroep Weurt+ and Vereniging Stedelijk Leefmilieu Nijmegen v Directeur van de dienst Milieu en Water van de provincie Gelderland (C-419/97). Reference for a preliminary ruling: Raad van State - Netherlands. Environment - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Concept of "waste". Joined cases C-418/97 and C-419/97.
  32. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2002. Abfall Service AG (ASA) v Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria. Environment - Waste - Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on shipments of waste - Competence of the authority of dispatch to scrutinise the classification of the purpose of a shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment on the ground of an incorrect classification - Directive 75/442/EEC on waste - Classification of deposit of waste in a disused mine. Case C-6/00.
  33. The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992), Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 to 14 June 1992. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900031647.   
  34. Claudia Saladin (2000), Precautionary Principle in International Law, in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 6, nº 3, Out.Dez. 2000, pp. 270-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2000.6.4.270.
  35. Joel Tickner, Carolyn Raffensperger e Nancy Myers (2000), The Precautionary Principle in Action – a Handbook, Science and Environmental Health Network.
  36. Nicholas A. Ashford (2002), Incorporating Science, Technology, Fairness, And Accountability in Environmental, Health and Safety Decisions, Rosie Cooney (s.d.), Precaution and Invasive Alien Species: Challenges at the Interface of the Trade and Environment Regimes.
  37. Devra Lee Davis (1999), Environmental Health and the Precautionary Principle, Massachusetts Precautionary Principle Project Kickoff Meeting de 15 May 1999, Framingham State College.
  38. Devra Lee Davis (2002), When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution, Basic Books, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3985785.
  39. Peter T. Saunders (2000), Use And Abuse Of The Precautionary Principle, ISIS – The Institute of Science in Society, London.
  40. Cass R. Sunstein (2002), Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
  41. Cass R. Sunstein (2002), The Paralyzing Principle, in Regulation, winter 2002-2003, pp. 32-37
  42. Peter Van Doren (2003), Letting Environmentalists’ Preferences Count, in Regulation, Autumn 2003.
  43. John N. Hathcock (2000), The Precautionary Principle – An Impossible Burden Of Proof For New Products, in AgBioForum, Vol. 3, Nº 4, 2000, pp. 255-258.
  44. European Commission (2000), Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM (2000)1, Brussels, 2 Feb. 2000.
  45. Laetitia De Jaegher, Management of Uncertainty And The Balance Between Precaution and Innovation: Towards New Strategies for a Sustainable Risk Management, Bio-Science Law Review, Lawtext Publishing.
  46. Eva Pongrácz (2002), Re-defining the Concepts of Waste and Waste Management.
  47. Prof. van Calster (2006), If ain’t broke, don’t fix it, in elni review, 1-2/2006, p. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2006.004.
  48. Richtlinie 94/62/EG Des Europäischen Parlaments Und Des Rates vom 20. Dezember 1994 über Verpackungen und Verpackungsabfälle, (ABl. L 365 vom 31.12.1994, S. 10).
  49. Test konsolidat: Id-Direttiva 2002/96/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-27 ta’ Jannar 2003 dwar skart ta’ tagħmir elettriku u elettroniku (WEEE).
  50. Richtlinie 2000/53/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. September 2000 über Altfahrzeuge (/ABI. L 269 vom 21.10.2000, S. 34).
  51. The Executive Order 13101, signed by President Bill Clinton in 14th of September of 1998, Executive Order 12101.
  52. Recycling Coalition (2006), The ‘Recycling Coalition’s’ reaction to the Commission proposal for a directive on Waste (COM (2005)667 final) - The need for a clear recycling definition in the Waste Directive, 27 April 2006.
  53. Eurofer (2005), The recycling concept in the context of the revision of the Waste Framework Directive, May 2005.
  54. ISO 14021 Environmental labels and declarations – Self declared environmental claims (Type II environmental labelling). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3403/30302829.
  55. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Fünfte Kammer) vom 19. Juni 2003. The Queen, auf Antrag von Mayer Parry Recycling Ltd, gegen Environment Agency und Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Beteiligte: Corus (UK) Ltd und Allied Steel and Wire Ltd (ASW). Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - Vereinigtes Königreich. Richtlinie 75/442/EWG, geändert durch die Richtlinie 91/156/EWG und die Entscheidung 96/350/EG - Richtlinie 94/62/EG - Begriff Abfälle - Begriff Rückführung/stoffliche Verwertung (recycling) - Behandlung von metallischen Verpackungsabfällen. Rechtssache C-444/00.
  56. Eva Pongrácz (2002), Re-defining the Concepts of Waste and Waste Management.
  57. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Zweite Kammer) vom 11. November 2004. Strafverfahren gegen Antonio Niselli. Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Tribunale di Terni - Italien. Richtlinien 75/442/EWG und 91/156/EWG - Begriff "Abfälle" - Wieder verwendbare Produktions- oder Verbrauchsrückstände - Eisenschrott. Rechtssache C-457/02.
  58. Richtlinie 94/62/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Dezember 1994 über Verpackungen und Verpackungsabfälle, OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10–23.
  59. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2003. AvestaPolarit Chrome Oy. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland. Approximation of laws - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Meaning of waste - Production residue - Mine - Use - Storage - Article 2(1)(b) - Meaning of other legislation - National legislation outside the framework of Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC. Case C-114/01.
  60. Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2004. Criminal proceedings against Marco Antonio Saetti and Andrea Frediani. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale di Gela - Italy. Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Waste management - Definition of waste - Petroleum coke. Case C-235/02.
  61. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 1997. Criminal proceedings against Euro Tombesi and Adino Tombesi (C-304/94), Roberto Santella (C-330/94), Giovanni Muzi and others (C-342/94) and Anselmo Savini (C-224/95). Reference for a preliminary ruling: Pretura circondariale di Terni - Italy. Waste - Definition - Council Directives 91/156/EEC and 91/689/EEC - Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93. Joined cases C-304/94, C-330/94, C-342/94 and C-224/95.
  62. Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 29 January 2004. Criminal proceedings against Paul Van de Walle, Daniel Laurent, Thierry Mersch and Texaco Belgium SA. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour d'appel de Bruxelles - Belgium.
  63. Environment - Waste - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Meaning of "waste', "producer of waste' and "holder of waste' - Soil infiltrated by leaked hydrocarbons - Independent operation of a service station belonging to a petroleum company. Case C-1/03.
  64. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2007. Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Concept of waste - Food scraps from the agro-food industry intended for the production of animal feed - Leftovers from the preparation of food in kitchens, intended for shelters for pet animals. Case C-195/05.
  65. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 September 2005. Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Meaning of "waste" - Directives 85/337/EEC and 97/11/EC - Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment - Directive 80/68/EEC - Protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances - Directive 91/271/EEC - Urban waste-water treatment - Directive 91/676/EEC - Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources - Pollution caused by a pig farm. Case C-416/02.