Skip to main content

Implications of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol on other Conventions. The case of HFC-23 destruction

Lambert Schneider, Jakob Graichen and Nele Matz

elni Review 2005, Issue 1,  pp. 40-51. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2005.005

The destruction of HFC-23 waste streams in new HCFC-22 production facilities under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is likely to have negative implications for both the mitigation of climate change and the protection of the ozone layer. These consequences were not foreseen when the Kyoto Protocol and its guidelines were drawn up. This paper describes the economic and environmental consequences of such CDM projects and looks for solutions which would make use of the cost-efficient abatement potential whilst avoiding negative environmental implications. Within the CDM, negative environmental effects could be avoided by introducing an adjustment factor depending on future market prices for certified emission reduction units and other parameters. Alternatively, the HFC-23 waste stream could be abated using financial support from multilateral funds which could possibly draw upon synergies with the financial mechanisms under the Montreal Protocol and the Stockholm Convention.

Access full article

References

  1. Annex to decision 17/CP.7. Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism as defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2.
  2. Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for GHG emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, OJ 2004 L 338/18.
  3. Haites, E. 2004: Estimating the Market Potential for the Clean Development Mechanisms. Review of Models and Lessons Learned. PCF, IEA, and IETA, PCFplus Report 19, Washington DC, USA.
  4. IPCC 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg059.
  5. Montreal Protocol.
  6. UNFCCC, AM0001: Incineration of HFC 23 waste streams for Abatement of Emissions from HFC-22 Production.  
  7. Rand, S., Ottinger, D., Branscome, M., 1999, Opportunities for the reduction of HFC-23 emissions from the production of HCFC-22. Proceedings from the joint IPCC-TEAP expert meeting 1999.
  8. IPCC (1996): Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 3. Reference Manual, page 2.
  9. Harnisch, J., Höhne, N. 2002: Comparison of Emissions Estimates Derived from Atmospheric Measurements with National Estimates of HFCs, PFCs and SF6. ESPR 9 (5), pp. 315-320, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987573.
  10. UNFCCC, Executive Board of the Clean Development Mechanism, seventeenth meeting, Report, 2004.
  11. US EPA 2001: U.S. High GWP Gas Emissions 1990-2010: Inventories, Projections and Opportunities for Reduction.
  12. International Workshop on HFC-23 Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM) Project Cooperation in China. 4-6 February 2004. Sanya City, Hainan Province, China.
  13. IPCC/TEAP, 2005, Special Report on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons.
  14. UNFCCC, Meeting report of the thirteenth meeting of the Methodological Panel under the CDM Executive Board.
  15. Sadat-Akhavi, A. 2003: Methods of Resolving Conflicts Between Treaties.
  16. Pauwelyn, J. 2003: Conflict of Norms in Public International Law.
  17. Matz, N. 2005, Wege zur Koordinierung völkerrechtlicher Verträge, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37639-2_1.
  18. Wolfrum, R., Matz, N. 2003: Conflicts in International Environmental Law.