Skip to main content

Greening the Constitution. The principle of sustainable development anchored in the Belgian Constitution

Peter de Smedt, Hendrik Schoukens and Tania Van Laer

elni Review 2012, Issue 2,  pp. 74-82. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2012.013

The concept of sustainable development is getting settled well within the framework of environmental law. The current meaning of this concept was defined by the report Our Common Future (1987) of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED): "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Since the publication of the Bundtlandreport in 1987, the concept of sustainable development can no longer be thought away from the political scene. Especially since the Conference of Rio in 1992 the concept has been used more often in juridical texts, at international as well as at European level. 
Also in the Belgian legal order, the concept of sustainable development has found its way into legislation at federal as well as at regional level step-by-step. As in international documents and treaties, the concept is mostly formulated as a policy goal.
After examining the anchoring of sustainable development in the Belgian Constitution the authors of this article discuss the concept's juridical enforceability and subsequently analyse the consequences of this qualification for the application in the jurisprudence. The article ends with some concluding remarks.

Access full article

References

  1. United Nations, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (‘Brundtland Report’).
  2. United Nations, 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26.
  3. K. Bosselmann, The Principle of Sustainability. Transforming Law and Governance, Aldershot (Hampshire), 2008, 25-41.
  4. M-C., Cordonnier Segger, ‘Sustainable Development in International Law’, in H. Christian Bugge en C. VOIGT (eds.), Sustainable Development in International and National Law, The Avosetta Series (8), Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2008, 91-113.
  5. M.C. Cordonier Segger en A. Khalfan, Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practice and Prospects, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, 350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276707.001.0001.  
  6. D. French, ‘International Law ‘in the field’ of Sustainable Development: The Elaboration of Legal Principles’, Environmental Law and Management 2004, 296-300.
  7. C.H. Born, D. Jans, Ch. Thielbaut, C.H. Born, ‘Le développement durable entre dans la Constitution’, in En hommage à Francis Delpéree. Itinéraires d’un constitutionaliste, Brussel, Bruylant, - Parijs, LGFJ, 2007, 209-230.
  8. C.H. Born ‘Le développement durable: un objectif de politique générale à valeur constitutionelle’, RBDC 2007, 193- 246.
  9. P. De Smedt, ‘Duurzame ontwikkeling als beleidsdoelstelling verankerd in de Grondwet. Op zoek naar de maakbare samenleving?’ in X., Liber amicorum Hubert Bocken. Dare la luce, Brugge, die Keure, 2010, 301- 332.
  10. F. Delpérée, ‘À propos du développement durable. Dix questions de méthodologie constitutionelle’, in G. DE LEVAL, M. PÂQUES en V. DUHART (eds.), Liber Americorum Paul Martens. L’humanisme dans la résolution des conflits. Utopie ou réalité ?, Brussel, Larcier, 2007, 223-233.
  11. J.-F., NEURAY En M. PALLEMAERTS, ‘L’environnement et le développement durable dans la Constitution belge’, Amén. 2008 (numéro special), 131-141.
  12. M. VIDAL, ‘Duurzame ontwikkeling in de Grondwet’, Juristenkrant 2007/149, 5.
  13. Preparatory Report of the Senate, 2005-2006, nr .3-1178/2, 74 en 78-79.
  14. Preparatory Report of the Chamber, 2005-2006, nr. 51-2647/004, 3.
  15. Order of the Minister of Environment, December 23, 2008.
  16. L. Krämer, ‘Sustainable Development in EC Law’, in H. CHRISTIAN BUGGE, C. VOIGT (eds.), Sustainable Development in International and National Law, o.c., 393.
  17. F. Delpérée, ‘À propos du développement durable. Dix questions de méthodologie constitutionelle’, in G. DE LEVAL, M. PÂQUES, V. DUHART (eds.), Liber Americorum Paul Martens. L’humanisme dans la résolution des conflits. Utopie ou réalité?, Brussel, Larcier, 2007, 227 en 231.
  18. J. Vervaet, C. Van De Heyning, ‘Hoe fundamentele rechten het leefmilieu beschermen’, NjW 2010, 570.
  19. J.M. Verschuuren, De laatste wilde hamster in Nederland en de grondslagen van het Europees en internationaal milieurecht, Deventer, W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 2000, 12-13.
  20. Council of State, Judgment nr. 177.450, 30 November 2007, n.v. Moerwegel Mink.
  21. Preparatory Report of the Senate, 2005-2006, nr. 3-1557/1, 3.
  22. Preparatory Report of the Senate, 2005-2006, nr. 3-1778/2, 39.
  23. Conseil Constitutionnel, Décision n° 2005-514, 28 april 2005, JO, May 4, 2005, 7702.
  24. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1829, Judgment of the Court of 22 June 1989. Fratelli Costanzo SpA v Comune di Milano. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale amministrativo regionale della Lombardia - Italy. Public works contracts - Abnormally low tenders - Direct effect of directives in relation to administrative authorities (Case 103/88).
  25. L. Lavrysen, Principle of Integration: The Belgian Report, Avosseta (Budapest April, 18/19, 2008).
  26. X. Theunis, ‘Le développement durable: une seconde nature’, Amèn. 2000 (numéro special), 9.
  27. Council of State, 9 January 2007, nr. 166.439, Apers.
  28. H. Veinla, Sustainable Development as the Fundamental Principle of Europe’s Environmental Ius Commmune’, o.c., 118-120
  29. H. Veinla, Precautionary Environmental Protection and Human Rights, Juridica International 2007, 95.
  30. Belgian House of Representatives, 2014, Belgian Constitution.
  31. President of the Court of First Instance of Brussel, 27 April 2001, Journ. Proc. 2001, 22, N. DE SADELEER, ‘La sanction de l’ommission d’une autorité publique de mettre en oeuvre une législation fiscale’.
  32. Constitutional Court, nr. 75/2011, 25 May 2011.
  33. Council of State, 19 April 2007, nr. 170.173, Aktiekomitee voor milieubescherming te Merelbeke.
  34. Council of State, 24 February 2005, nr. 141.217, Keymolen.
  35. Council of State, 27 January 2006, nr.  154.217, Musschoot
  36. Council of State, 15 July 2008, nr. 185.403, vzw zusters van de H. Vincentius A Paulo Van Deftinghe.
  37. Council of State, 29 April 2002, nr. 106.127, Uyttenhove.