Skip to main content

Intellectual Property Rights, Genetical Resources and Traditional Knowledge: An Approach from the Perspective of Megadiverse Countries

Aírton Guilherme Berger Filho

elni Review 2010, Issue 2,  pp. 59-63. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2010.008

In recent years, the press has reported on diverse cases of research, appropriation and commercialization by multinational companies of medicines, agricultural seeds and other by-products of biodiversity, without respect for the rights of the native populations and the local communities regarding their territory, their cultural and environmental goods. This practice, known as biopiracy, seeks to obtain the rights of intellectual property, mainly so as to acquire the patent of products and processes derived from research and innovations on the uses of biological diversity which is often guided by study of traditional knowledge. From the “ethnobioprospecting” concept used to explore biological information based on traditional knowledge, scientists have facilitated the discovery of new active principles and new species in megadiverse regions, reducing the time and the costs of obtaining new substances and products. There are high expectations about the uses that could be made of the exploitation of genetic diversity, bearing in mind that most biodiversity is barely studied or known. 
As a result there have been intense debates in law and in international relations about the access and intellectual appropriation of biodiversity, and the related traditional knowledge. It is considered a matter of a geopolitical onslaught among, on the one hand, the developed countries, rich in science and technology, with a financial, though poor, abundance of resources in genetic and cultural diversity, and, on the other hand, the developing countries, with scarce technological, scientific, and financial resources, but with the vast majority of the genetic resources and its associated traditional knowledge.

Access full article

References

  1. Shiva, Vandana. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press. 1996.
  2. Arnt, Ricardo. Tesouro verde, In: Exame, ano 35, nº 9, 2/5/2001.
  3. Albagli, Sarita. Geopolítica da Biodiversidade. Brasília: IBAMA. 1998.
  4. Lévêque, Christian. La biodiversité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 1997.
  5. Reaka-Kudla, Marjorie L.; Wilson, Don E.; Wilson, Edward O. Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Washington: Joseph Henry Press, 1997.
  6. Gross, Tony, Jonston, Barber, Charles Victor. The Convention on Biological Diversity: Understanding and Influencing the Process. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, The Equator Initiative. 2006.
  7. The TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).
  8. World Trade Organisation (WTO), The Relationship Between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Summary of Issues Raised and Points Made IP/C/W/368/Rev.1, 8 February 2006.