Skip to main content Skip to page footer
elni logo elni logo

‘Biodiversity damage’ liability in the Environmental Liability Directive – its definition and delimitation from more stringent EU, international and national norms

Volker Mauerhofer

elni Review 2008, Issue 1,  pp. 19-24. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2008.004

The Environmental Liability Directive (‘ELD’) of the European Union entered into force on 30th April 2004 and had to be implemented by 30th April 2007. It had been already from the early beginning up to today subject to multiple considerations by many scholars and is implemented quite differently in the different EU Member States. The ELD contains provisions concerning the liability for ‘environmental damage’, which is further defined inter alia as a specific damage of certain species and habitats (‘biodiversity damage’). Besides the ELD there are already other legal provisions on the European as well as on the international and national level covering several aspects of these liability issues more stringently. Hence the question arises as to how the new provisions of the ELD delimit from these similar but other EU, international and national norms.

Access full article

References

  1. Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, Official Journal L 143, 30/04/2004 P. 0056-0075.
  2. M. Boyer and D. Porrini (2002), The choice of instruments for environmental policy: Liability or regulation? Research in Law and Economics 20: 245-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-5895(02)20013-5.
  3. Faeh (2007), Environmental Liability in Switzerland – Selected Aspects, JEEPL 3, 227-232.
  4. L. Krämer (2005), Discussion on Directive 2004/35 Concerning Environmental Liability, JEEPL 5, 250-256.
  5. Klaphake (2005), The Assessment and Restoration of Biodiversity Damages, JEEPL 4, 268-276.
  6. J. Kokott, A. Klaphake and S. Marr (2005), Key Elements of a Liability Regime Taking into Account Ecological Damages, JEEPL 4, 277-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187601005X00057.
  7. P. Weenerås (2005), A Progressive Interpretation of the Environmental Liability Directive, JEEPL 4, 257-267.
  8. K-H. Fehr, B. Friedrich and S. Scheil (2007), Liability Directive – a Useful Tool for Nature Protection? JEEPL 2, 110-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187601007X00118.
  9. F. Coroner (2007), Member States missing the opportunity to implement ‘polluter pays’ principle, elni review 1, 30 – 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2007.005.
  10. J. Anstee-Wedderburn (2007), A Consideration of the Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive to Date, JEEPL 3, 221-226.
  11. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitants and of wild fauna and flora, GU L 206.
  12. Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p. 1–18.
  13. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7–50.
  14. Commission of the European Communities, 2002, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, COM(2002) 17 final.
  15. Case of the direct effect of a protocol of the Alpine Convention by the ‘Umweltsenat’ (Environmental Senate) in US 6B/2003/8-57 from 22nd March 2004.
  16. 93/626/EEC: Council Decision of 25 October 1993 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity, OJ L 309, 13.12.1993, p. 1–2.
  17. Übereinkommen über die biologische Vielfalt. BGBI. Nr. 213/1995.
  18. 82/461/EEC: Council Decision of 24 June 1982 on the conclusion of the Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals, OJ L 210, 19.7.1982, p. 10–10.
  19. Übereinkommen zur Erhaltung der wandernden wild lebenden Tierarten samt Anhängern, BGBI. III Nr. 149/2005.
  20. Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA), Official Journal L 345, 08/12/2006 P. 0026-0072.
  21. Bundesgesetzblatt (Österreich), 2002, Protokoll zur Durchführung der Alpenkonvention von 1991 im Bereich Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, 236/2002.
  22. Übereinkommen zum Schutz der Alpen (Alpenkonvention), 1991, 96/191/EG, BGBI. Nr. 477/1995.
  23. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2004. Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria. Directive 92/43/EEC - Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora - Habitat of the corncrake - Wörschacher Moos special protection area. Case C-209/02.
  24. Urteil des Gerichtshofes vom 2. August 1993. Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften gegen Königreich Spanien. Erhaltung der wildlebenden Vogelarten - Besondere Schutzgebiete. Rechtssache C-355/90.
  25. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, ĠU L 206.
  26. Urteil des Gerichtshofes vom 2. August 1993. Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften gegen Königreich Spanien. Erhaltung der wildlebenden Vogelarten - Besondere Schutzgebiete. Rechtssache C-355/90.
  27. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2002. Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection areas. Case C-117/00.
  28. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Zweite Kammer) vom 18. Dezember 2007. Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften gegen Königreich Spanien. Vertragsverletzung eines Mitgliedstaats - Richtlinie 79/409/EWG - Erhaltung der wildlebenden Vogelarten - Bewässerungsgebiet des Kanals Segarra-Garrigues (Lérida). Rechtssache C-186/06.
  29. Case C-418/04: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 79/409/EEC — Conservation of wild birds — Articles 4 and 10 — Transposition and application — IBA 2000 — Value — Quality of the data — Criteria — Margin of discretion — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 6 — Transposition and application).
  30. V. Mauerhofer (2008), 3-D Sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a Sustainable Development, Ecological Economics 65: 496-506 (504). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.011.
  31. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Große Kammer) vom 7. September 2004. Landelijke Vereniging tot Behoud van de Waddenzee und Nederlandse Vereniging tot Bescherming van Vogels gegen Staatssecretaris van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij. Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Raad van State - Niederlande. Richtlinie 92/43/EWG - Erhaltung der natürlichen Lebensräume sowie der wild lebenden Tiere und Pflanzen - Begriffe 'Plan' oder 'Projekt' - Prüfung der Verträglichkeit bestimmter Pläne oder Projekte für das Schutzgebiet. Rechtssache C-127/02.
  32. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 January 2005. Società Italiana Dragaggi SpA and Others v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti and Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Consiglio di Stato - Italy. Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora - National list of sites eligible for identification as sites of Community importance - Conservation measures. Case C-117/03.
  33. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2006. Bund Naturschutz in Bayern eV and Others v Freistaat Bayern. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Germany. Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Directive 92/43/EEC - Protection regime before the inclusion of a habitat in the list of sites of Community importance. Case C-244/05.
  34. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 January 2007. Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/43/EEC - Articles 12(1) and (2), 13(1)(b) and 16 - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Protection of species. Case C-183/05.
  35. Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Fünfte Kammer) vom 7. Januar 2004. The Queen, auf Antrag von Delena Wells gegen Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - Vereinigtes Königreich. Richtlinie 85/337/EWG - Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung bei bestimmten öffentlichen und privaten Projekten - Nationale Maßnahme, mit der eine Bergbaugenehmigung ohne Durchführug einer Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung erteilt wurde - Unmittelbare Wirkung von Richtlinien - Dreiecksverhältnis. Rechtssache C-201/02.
  36. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2002. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Protection of species. Case C-103/00.
  37. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 October 2005. Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Failure of a Member State to fufil obligations - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora. Case C-6/04.
  38. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2006. Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora - Assessment of the implications of certain projects on a protected site - Protection of species. Case C-98/03.
  39. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7–25.
  40. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2002. Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection areas. Case C-117/00.
  41. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2000. Commission of the European Communities v French Republic. Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection areas. Case C-374/98.
  42. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2004. Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria. Directive 92/43/EEC - Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora - Habitat of the corncrake - Wörschacher Moos special protection area. Case C-209/02.
  43. V. Mauerhofer, Conservation of wildlife in the European Union with a focus on Austria, in Raj Panjwani and David Favre (Eds.) Comparative Wildlife Laws, American Bar Association – ABA.
  44. ‘Landesgesetzblatt’ (Provincial Law Page) number 65/1976 in the version of 9/2007.