Skip to main content

The Legal Nature of the Biodiversity Provisions adopted by the Andean Community

Jimena Murillo Chávarro and Frank Maes

elni Review 2010, Issue 2,  pp. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2010.009

The Andean Community is a South American Regional Organization, nowadays composed of four of the seventeen states richest in biodiversity in the world. The Andean states are home to around 24 % of global biodiversity. Four countries are members: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.
The Andean Community began taking action in the field of biodiversity in the last ten years. As a result, it has elaborated a “Regional Biodiversity Strategy for the Tropical Andean Countries”, which was developed within the framework of the principles set out in the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (Agenda 21) and the Andean Community legislation. The main objective of the Regional Biodiversity Strategy is the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity as well as the region’s sustainable development. According to the legal system of this regional organisation, decisions are – irrespective of whether they are adopted by the Andean Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs or the Commission of the Andean Community (the two legislative institutions of the CAN) – part of the Andean legal system. Decisions are legally binding for the Member Countries and directly applicable from their day of publication in the official gazette onwards.
This article explains the definition of soft law, and provides a general description of the Andean Community and its legal instruments. The authors discuss the nature of Decision 523: Should this provision be considered soft or hard law and what are its legal implications?

Access full article

References

  1. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente, et al., Geo Andino 2003, Perspectivas del Medio Ambiente.
  2. Jan Klabbers, The Redundancy of Soft law, 65 Nordic J. Int’l L., 1996, pp. 167-182.
  3. Jan Klabbers, The Undesirability of Soft Law, Nordic J.Int’l L., 1998, p 381-391.
  4. Francis Snyder, Soft law and Institutional Practice in the European Community, in The Construction in Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noel.
  5. Linda Senden, Soft Law in European Community Law, 2004.
  6. D Thürer, The Role of Soft Law in the Actual Process of European Integration, in L´Avenir du Libre-échange en Europe: Vers un Espace Économique Européen? (O. Jacot-Guillarmod & P. Pescatore ed., 1990).
  7. Kenneth W. Abbott & Duncan Snidal, Hard and Soft law in international Governance, 54 Int’l Org. Issue 3, 2000, 421-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
  8. Richard Baxter, International Law in “Her Infinite Variety”, 29 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 1980, pp. 549-566.
  9. Pierre-Marie Dupuy, Soft Law and the International law of the Environment, 12 Mich J. Int’l L., 1991, pp. 420-435.
  10. Treaty of Creation of the Court of Justice adopted in 28 May of 1979.
  11. Secretaria General de la Comunidad Andina. V. Republica del Perú, p 10-11 [1999] Proceso 07-AI-99. Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina.
  12. Decisión 85 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Republica de Colombia, [1988] Proceso 2-IP-88, tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina.
  13. Compañía New Yorker S.A. V. las Resoluciones Nos: 171 y 210, del 17 de diciembre de 1998 y del 31 de marzo de 1999, expedidas por la Secretaria General de la Comunidad Andina, [1999] Proceso 24-AN-99. Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina.
  14. Acción de nulidad interpuesta por la República de Venezuela. V. las Resoluciones 397, 398 y 438 así como contra el Dictamen de Incumplimiento Nº 11-96, expedidos por la Junta del Acuerdo de Cartagena y referentes a la prohibición de importación de café tostado procedente de Colombia, [1997] Proceso 1-AN-97. Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina.
  15. Agenda Ambiental Andina, Proceso de elaboración de la ERB.
  16. Luisa Elena Guinand, De cómo se Incorporo el Tema Ambiental y el Desarrollo Sostenible en la Agenda de Integración Andina y otras Reflexiones, Revista da la Integracion 40 Anos de Integrancion Andina, Avances y Perspectivas. (Jun 2009).
  17. Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina, Octava Reunión Ordinaria del Comité Andino de Autoridades Ambientales (CAAAM). Marzo 8 de 2002, Lima - Peru. SG/R.CAAAM/VIII/INFORME.
  18. C.M. Chinkin, The Challenge of Soft Law: development and change in international law, 38 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 1989, 850-866.
  19. Gregory Shaffer & Mark Pollack. Hard VS. Soft law: Alternative, complements, and antagonist in International Governance, 94 Minn. L. Rev. issue 3, 2010, 706-799.
  20. Prosper Weil, Towards Relative Normativity in International law?, 77 Am. J. Int’t L. issue 3, 1983, pp. 413-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2201073.
  21. Kenneth W. Abbott, Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter & Duncan Snidal, The Concept of Legalization, 54 Int’l Org, issue 3, 2000, 401-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271.
  22. Richard Baxter, International Law in “Her Infinite Variety”, 29 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 1980, pp. 549-566.