Skip to main content Skip to page footer

EU Dieselgate: unveiling the weirdness of the EU’s attitude to compliance on environmental matters

Delphine Misonne

elni Review 2018, Issue 2, pp. 52-59. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2018.010

“Google fined €4.34bn by EU over Android antitrust violations”. June 2018: the European Commission imposes a record penalty, after a 39-month investigation into Google’s Android operating system. This worldwide level news confirms the power of the European Union and its Commission in relation to competition and antitrust issues: a direct power to investigate and a power to sanction. By contrast, European environmental law looks like a ‘parent pauvre’. In this area, the European Commission does not enjoy a similar centralized investigative power, not even a faint shadow of it. No European Union institution or agency has such power in environmental matters, not even the European Environmental Agency. While the Commission’s role is to ensure the full application of Community legislation on the environment, enforcement of environmental law is and has always been primarily a responsibility of the Member States. The present paper wants to address the question whether the current inspection landscape, as applicable in the European Union and as far as environmental matters (and emissions into the environment in particular) are concerned, could have taken hold of what is now called ‘dieselgate’ and if both aspects (dieselgate and inspection) are, somehow, interrelated.

Access full article

Reerences

  1. The Guardian, Wednesday 18 July 2018.
  2. L. Krämer, The Volkswagen Scandal – Air Pollution and Administrative inertia, elni Review, 2016, 2, pp. 64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2016.010.
  3. Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 April 2009 on the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network, OJ 2009 L 126/13.
  4. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ 2012 C C 326/47.
  5. J. Jans, European Environmental Law, Kluwer, 1990.
  6. European Parliament Research Service, D. Bourguignon, At a glance, 1 October 2015.
  7. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, Order of the President of the Court of 28 November 2013 The Queen on the application of ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Expedited procedure, Case C-404/13.
  8. Ryall, Enforcing EU Environmental Law against Member States: Air Pollution, National Courts and the Rule of Law, EJRR, 2/2015, pp. 305-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004621.
  9. J. Ewing (New York Times correspondent), Faster, Higher, Farther, The inside story of the Volkswagen scandal, Transworld publishers, London, 2017.
  10. Spiegel Online, The Three Students Who Uncovered 'Dieselgate', by Ph. Oemke, 23 October 2017.
  11. Complaint originally filed by the United States on behalf of the EPA on January 4th 2016, and amended on October 7th, 2016.
  12. Friedrich, Umweltbundsamt, ‘Sachtstandpapier: Erhöhte NoX-Emissionen von Euro-2-Lkw’.
  13. Directive 98/69/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to measures to be taken against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles and amending Council Directive 70/220/EEC, OJ 1998 L 350/1.
  14. Legal obligations relating to emission measurements in the EU automotive sector, study for the EMIS Committee, 2016, p. 15
  15. Regulation No 83 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements, OJ 2012 L 42/1.
  16. Regulation (EC) no 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, OJ 2007 L 171/1.
  17. JRC scientific and technical reports, 2011, Analyzing on-road emissions of light-duty vehicles with Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS).
  18. M. Weiss, P. Bonnel, R. Hummel, A. Provenza & U. Manfredi, ‘On-Road Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles in Europe’, Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, n°45, pp. 8575-8581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es2008424.
  19. Commission DG JRC press release (no date – ref. LD-NB-25572-EN-N).
  20. M. Becker, G. Traufetter, ‘How officials Ignored Years of Emissions Evidence’, in Spiegel Online 19 August 2016.
  21. L. Krämer, ‘The Volkswagen Scandal – Air Pollution and Administrative inertia’, ELNI Review, 2016, 2, pp. 64-74.
  22. M. di Rattalma, The dieselgate – A legal perspective, Springer, 2017.
  23. L. Krämer, Deficits in application of EC Environmental law and its causes, Focus on European Environmental Law, Sweet & Maxwell, Londres, 1997, p. 1.
  24. M. Heldemann-Robinson, Environmental Inspections and the EU: Securing an Effective Role for a Supranational Union Legal Framework, Transnational Environmental Law, 2017, vol.6, pp. 31-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102515000291.
  25. J. Jans, European Environmental Law, Kluwer, 1990.
  26. Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law, OJ 2008 L 328/28.
  27. 1996 Communication on ‘Implementing Community environmental law’, European Commission.
  28. Council Regulation (EEC) No 1210/90 of 7 May 1990 on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network, OJ 1990 L 120/1.
  29. P. Wenneras, The Enforcement of EC Environmental Law, Oxford, OUP, 2007.
  30. “group of experts on environmental compliance and governance”, by Commission Decision of 18.01.2018.
  31. Commission Report 2017, Monitoring the application of EU law, July 2018, statistical overview.
  32. 12 July 2017, Commission report on monitoring the application of EU law.
  33. N. de Sadeleer, “Harmonizing Car Emissions, Air Quality, and Fuel Quality Standards in the Wake of the VW Scandal, EJRR, 2016/1, pp. 11-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005328
  34. Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive), OJ 2007 L 263/1. 
  35. Regulation (EC) no 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, OJ 2007 L 171/1.
  36. European Parliament, ‘Legal obligations relating to emission measurements in the EU automotive sector’, study for the EMIS Committee, 2016.
  37. F. Aggeri & J. M. Saussois, La puissance des grandes entreprises mondialisées à l’épreuve du judiciaire: de l’affaire Volkswagen au dieselgate, Revue française de gestion, Paris, Vol. 43, n°269, novembre 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2018.00208.
  38. Brand, “Beyond ‘Dieselgate’: Implications of unaccounted and future air pollutant emissions and energy use for cars in the United Kingdom”, Energy Policy 97 (2016) 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.036.
  39. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2018, Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018, Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation, Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.
  40. Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC, OJ 2018 L 1515/1.
  41. Report of the European Court of Auditors, The EU’s response to the “dieselgate” scandal, February 2019.
  42. 27 July 2017. The cartel. Collusion between Germany’s biggest carmakers.
  43. Maher, A Fine Balance: The National Courts, the European Commission and EU Competition Law, 33, Dublin University Law Journal, 2011.
  44. M.Führ, Der Dieselskandal und das Recht („the dieselscandal and the law“), Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ) 36 (5), 2018, 265-273.