Skip to main content

European investment projects in third countries: LEGALLY GREEN?

Daria Ratsiborinskaya

elni Review 2012, Issue 1,  pp. 2-7. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2012.001

This article provides an overview of the corporate self-regulation by five European-based multilateral financial institutions where European environmental acquis is applied in investment projects in the third countries. Academic research on environmental standards suffers from a certain imbalance. While scientific studies of European ambient standards and standards regulating environmental performance and its consequences are ample, little has been written so far about their application by the European players outside the European Union. This gap in the literature is, however, critical, considering the leading role the Union seeks to play in the proliferation of high environmental standards worldwide.
To provide background, existing international incentives to stimulate the ‘greening’ of investment are described, in particular focusing on the launch of European Principles for Environment by some investment banks, which has led to their voluntary application of legal European environmental standards outside of the EU. The article elaborates on the nature and character of standards being applied in the framework of the investment projects. It considers the possibility of a certain mutual influence between the ‘exported’ European and national environmental standards of host countries, leading to an approximation effect. Furthermore, attention is paid to the driving forces behind the voluntary environmental self-regulation. It is argued that homogenous introduction of high legal standards causes a positive effect on general FDI patterns, with investment becoming a stimulus of proper environmental regulation in the host countries. The article also addresses the academic debate around the role of European Union as a normative (green) power, extending its ‘legal space’ beyond its geographical borders. It stands still by the Common Investment Policy that currently takes shape at the Union level. Finally, concluding remarks are presented on the positive role of investment banks in promoting European environmental standards worldwide. It also calls for the comprehensive EU investment regime to stay ahead of international developments.

Access full article

References

  1. Wenhua S., Sheng Z. (2011) The Treaty of Lisbon: Half Way toward a Common Investment Policy. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21(4) p. 1059.
  2. Economic and Financial Indicators, The Economist, 28.01.2012.
  3. Mabey N., McNally R. (1998) Foreign Direct Investment and the environment. From pollution havens to sustainable development. WWF-UK Report.
  4. Neumayer E. (1999) Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Lessons for the WTO from the failed OECD-negotiations. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 46 (6), 618–628.
  5. Gray K. (2002) Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Impacts – Is the Debate Over? RECIEL 11(3), 306-313.
  6. Pieth M. (2009) Preface. In Peters A. et al (eds.) Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, Cambridge University Press.
  7. Yeoh P. (2009) Sustainable banking: The Commercial and Legal Impacts of Private Self-Regulatory Initiatives, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 12, 274-288.
  8. OECD (2011), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD Publishing.
  9. Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, OJ 2002 L 242/1.
  10. Schaper M. (2009) Non-State Environmental Standards as a Substitute for State Regulation? In Peters a. et al. (eds.). Non-State Actors as Standard Setters: The Erosion of the Public-Private Divide. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635519.012.
  11. Peters A., Förster T., Koechlin L. (2009) Towards non-state actors as effective, legitimate, and accountable standard setters. In Peters A. et al (eds.) Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, Cambridge University Press, 492-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635519.019.
  12. EBRD Environmental and Social Policy (2008).
  13. Biedenkopf K. (2009) Policy Diffusion and Environmental Pioneership: Insights for Transatlantic Cooperation fostering Biodiversity and Biosafety? Institute of International Studies Research Programme.
  14. Schimmelfennig F., Sedelmeier U. (2005) The Europeanisation of Central and Eastern Europe, Cornell University Press.
  15. Douma W. (2010) The EBRD and Russia: Stimulating European Principles for the Environment. In Mucklow F., Douma W. (eds.) Environmental Finance and Socially Responsible Business in Russia, T.M.C. Asser Press.
  16. Cordonnier Segger M., Gehring M. et al. (eds.) (2011) Sustainable Development in World Investment Law, Kluwer Law International.
  17. Knill C., Tosun J., Heichel S. (2008) Balancing competitiveness and conditionality: environmental policymaking in low-regulating countries, Journal of European Public Policy 15 (7), 1001-1018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802310512.
  18. Spatareanu M. (2007) Searching for pollution havens: the impact of environmental regulations on foreign direct Investment. Journal of environment and development 16 (2), 161-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1070496507302873.
  19. Levinson A., Taylor M. (2008) Unmasking The Pollution Haven Effect, International Economic Review, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, 49 (1), 223-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x
  20. Nordström H., Vaughan S. (1999) Trade and Environment, Special studies 4. World Trade Organization Report.
  21. Porter M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press.
  22. Kalamova M., Johnstone N. (2011) Environmental Policy Stringency and Foreign Direct Investment, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 33, OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg8ghvf85d5-en.
  23. ‘The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development: An Environmental Progress Report‘.
  24. Aldson F. (2011) EU Law and Sustainability in Focus: Will the Lisbon Treaty Lead to ‘The Sustainable Development of Europe’? Dissertation, Academia.edu.
  25. Vogler J. (2005) The European Contribution to Global Environmental Governance. International Affaires 81 (4), 835-850.
  26. Manners I. (2002) Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2).
  27. Lazowski A. (2009) With but without you...The Europeanisation of Legal Orders of the Neighbouring Countries. In A. Ott and E. Vos (Eds.), 50 Years of European Integration: Foundations and Perspectives. T.M.C. Asser Press & Cambridge University Press, The Hague, 247-270.
  28. Falkner R. (2006) The European Union as a ‘Green Normative Power’? EU Leadership in International Biotechnology Regulation. Centre for European Studies Working Paper Series No. 140.
  29. Vogler J., Stephan H. (2007) The European Union in global environmental governance: Leadership in the making? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 7(4), 389-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9051-5.
  30. Kelemen, R. (2010) Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 335-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003662065.
  31. Foreign Direct Investment. European Commission webpage.
  32. European Commission, 2010, Commission Proposal for a Regulation Establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries, COM(2010) 344.
  33. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), OJ 2012 C 226/47.