elni Review 2011, Issue 2,  pp. 87-95. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2011.011

In order to get the general public more involved in decisions regarding sustainable economic development, the Brazilian Congress approved a law specifically targeting availability and access to environmental information in 2003. This law was clearly inspired by the principles of 1998 Aarhus Convention which established the procedural rights to access to environmental information, public participation and access to court in environmental matters among European countries. This paper aims to compare the Aarhus Convention – with its innovative nature and open administrative and democratic practices – with applications on access to environmental information in Brazil. It first gives a brief explanation of the Aarhus Convention, followed by an overview of access to environmental information in Brazilian legislation and its recent evolution. The paper compares Brazilian legislation and the Aarhus Convention and identifies which criteria of the Aarhus Convention regarding access to environmental information have already been introduced in Brazilian legislation. In addition, the paper discusses the actual effectiveness of Brazilian Law 10.650/03 through an empirical exercise seeking to estimate how often it has been used to access environmental information.

Access full article

References

1. Wiener, Norbert. “Cybernetics or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine”. Massachusetts: First MIT Press Paperback, 1965.
2. PNUD – Brazil.” Área coberta por florestas é reduzida no Brasil, aponta estudo de Centro da ONU” [The territory covered by forests is reduced in Brazil, says UN study center].
3. Freitas, Marcos de at all. “Gestão de recursos hídricos no Brasil: a experiência da Agência Nacional de Águas”.
4. Brazilian Law 10.650/03.
5. Art. 10 of the Rio Declaration, adopted at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) (known as the “Earth Summit”) which took place at Rio de Janeiro from 3 to 14 June 1992.
6. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
7. National Policy of Environment (1981).
8. The Law of Public Action (1985).
9. Policy Act National Coastal Management (1988).
10. Pesticide Law (1989).
11. National Environment Fund (1989).
12. Law 8.079 of 1990 (Code of Consumer Protection).
13. Law of Environmental Education (1999).
14. Law of National Water Agency (2000).
15. Statute of the City (2001).
16. Brazilian Federal Law 9.433/97.
17. Federal Law 10.650/03.
18. Loures, Flavia Tavares Rocha. “A Implementação do Direito à Informação Ambiental.” Milaré Advogados Consultoria em Meio Ambiente. 2008.
19. Stec, Stephen and Casey- Lefkowitz, Susan. The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide. New York: United Nations, 2000.
20. Jordão, Priscila. “61% dos brasileiros não têm acesso à web.” Portal Exame. 06 April 2010.
21. Brazilian Federal Constitution.
22. Ambiente, Ministério do Meio. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis.
23. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe “Extraordinary session of the Meeting of the Parties 2010.”
24. Esquirol, Jorge L. “The Failed Law of Latin America.” American Journal of Comparative Law, 2008:75-124.
25. BMJ.com Sackett, DL, et al. 'Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't: It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence', (editorial) British Medical Journal, vol. 312, pp. 71-72 (January 13, 1996).
26. Amaral, Gilberto Luiz do Amaral. “Quantidade de normas editadas no brasil: 20 anos da constituição federal de 1988”.
27. Lemos, Maria Carmen M. “Popular Participation and Pollution Control in Brazil.” In Participation and the quality of environmental decision making, door Frans H. J. M. Coenen, Dave Huitema en Laurence J. O'Toole, 337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5330-0.
28. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publihers, 1998.