Skip to main content

Downsizing our Water Footprint

Marga Robesin

elni Review 2012, Issue 2,  pp. 63-67. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2012.011

884 million people are without adequate access to clean drinking water and 2.6 billion people lack access to basic sanitary services. Due to preventable water and sanitation-related diseases an average of 5.000 children dies each day. This is not only caused by the absence of local adequate water infrastructure, but also by regional water scarcity. In the near future the problem of water scarcity will even increase in several regions of the world because of factors like a growing world population and climate change. How can we stop this fatal trend?
Left aside the need for a better water infrastructure and other measures to improve access to clean drinking water and sanitary services, the global water demand needs to be reduced. Not only for the sake of people, but also for the protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. Using water saving showerheads in our households is not enough to achieve substantial water use reduction. In the past decade scientists have developed methods to calculate our water footprint in the world. In 2011 the Global Standard for Water Footprint Assessment, developed by the Water Footprint Network (WFN) was published. It shows that the major part of our water footprint (WF) consists of water that is used for the production of our food and other products we consume. Famous examples are the 15.000 litres water needed to produce one kg beef or the fact that 140 litres water are used for the production of one (Dutch) cup of coffee. 
Reduction of humanity's water footprint is urgently needed in order to keep water use within the boundaries of our planet. This article intends to give a short overview of current discussions on the question how to achieve substantial water footprint reduction, focussing in particular on certification and labelling.

Access full article

References

  1. Progress on drinking Water and Sanitation, 2012 update. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. ISBN 978-924-1503297.
  2. UNESCO, 2012, Managing water under uncertainty and risk. World Water Development Report (WWDR) 4, volume 1, ISBN 978-92-3-104235-5.
  3. Y. Hoekstra (ed). Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, 12-13 December 2002, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12, UNESCO-IHE, Delft.
  4. A.Y. Hoekstra et al. The Water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan, 2011, ISBN 978-1-84971-279-8.
  5. Chapagain, A.K., and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2007) The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands, Ecological Economics 64(1): 109-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.022.
  6. State of the Planet Declaration by the Conference Planet under Pressure, March 2012 in London.
  7. Scarcity in a sea of plenty? Global resource scarcities and policies in the European Union and the Netherlands. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. The Hague, 2011.
  8. Hoekstra and A. Chapagain. Globalization of Water. Sharing the Planet’s Freshwater Resources. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
  9. The Environmental Outlook Baseline; output from IMAGE model suite.
  10. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Roads from Rio. Pathways to achieve global sustainability goals by 2050: Summary and Main Findings to the full report, The Hague, 2012 ISBN: 978-90-78645-98-6.
  11. PBL Roads from Rio+20. Pathways to achieve global sustainability goals by 2050, The Hague, June 2012, ISBN: 978-94-91506-00-0, PBL publication number: 500213001.
  12. Growing within Limits. A Report to the Global Assembly 2009 of the Club of Rome. Netherlands Environmental Agency (PBL), Bilthoven, October 2009.
  13. Hoekstra, A.Y. (2006) ‘The global dimension of water governance: Nine reasons for global arrangements in order to cope with local water problems’, Value of Water Research Series No. 20, UNESCO-IHE, p. 18, Globalization, p. 140.
  14. Jacob W. Kijne. Unlocking the water potential of agriculture. FAO, 2003.
  15. Water footprint Network, n.d., National water footprint.
  16. Met Recht naar Klimaatbescherming. Over de rol van het recht en de markt voor het klimaatbeleid. Prof. Marjan Peeters. Maastricht 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26481/spe.20090213mp.
  17. Living Planet Report 2010. WWF 2011.
  18. UNEP (2012) Measuring water use in a green economy, A Report of the Working Group on Water Efficiency to the International Resource Panel. McGlade, J. et al. ISBN 978-92-807-3220-7.
  19. European Commission, 2011, Commission Staff Working Paper, Analysis associated with the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe Part II, Accompanying the document, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, SEC(2011) 1067 final.
  20. Anec Position, Environmental Assessment goes Astray. A Critique of Environmental Footprint Methodology and its Ingredients. ANEC-ENV-2012-G-008final 22 May 2012.
  21. European Environment Agency, 2012, ‚Rio+20 agreement – a modest step in the right direction.
  22. European Commission, 2012, Statement by Commissioner Janez Potocnik on behalf of the EU and its Member States on the adoption of the outcome of the Rio Conference.
  23. European Commission, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Sommittee and the Committee of the Regions, A resource-efficient Europe – Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy, COM(2011) 21 final.
  24. European Commission, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, COM (2011) 571 final.
  25. A.Y. Hoekstra. How sustainable is Europe’s Water Footprint? WWI Water & Wastewater International. Vol. 26, issue 2, p. 24-26.
  26. European Parliament Resolution of 24 May 2012 on a Resource Efficient Europe. P7_TA-PROV(2012)0223, 61 .
  27. EP Resolution on a Resource efficient Europe, P7_TA-PROV(2012)0223, 62.
  28. European, Commission, 2012, Consultation Paper: Options for Resource Efficiency Indicators.
  29. 2011/2068 (INI), Resource-efficient Europe.
  30. Certification and biodiversity. Exploring improvements in the effectiveness of certification schemes on biodiversity. KPMG Advisory N.V. January 2012.
  31. Steering Committee of the State-of-Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification. (2012). Toward sustainability: The roles and limitations of certification. (Executive summary). Washington, DC: RESOLVE, Inc. p. 14- 15.
  32. EU Ecolabel for food and feed products – feasibility study (ENV.C.1/ETU/2010/0025) Oakdene Hollins Research & Consulting. October 2011.
  33. ISO 14046:2014. Environmental management – Water footprint – Principles, requirements and guidelines.
  34. Global Ecolabel Monitor, Towards Transparency, 2010.
  35. Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. A. Galli et al. Ecological Indicators vol. 16 (2012) 100–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017.