elni Review 2007, Issue 1,  pp. 18-24. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2007.003

One of the main goals of the Directive 85/337/EEC, on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (“EIA Directive”), expressed in its Preamble, is to ensure that projects that are likely to have significant environmental impact proceed only after prior assessment of their likely effect on the environment, based on appropriate information supplied by the developer and with proper avenues for public participation. The European Court of Justice (ECD) repeatedly narrowed down the (originally large) scope of discretion of the member states in deciding whether a project shall be subject to EIA or not by requiring the environmental impact assessment for any project which is likely to have serious impacts de facto. 
Central to this article is a description of the typical and most important gaps of implementation of the EIA directive, emerging from the specific traffic infrastructure cases. Prior to that, some general remarks on the typical characteristics and problems concerning transposition of the EIA Directive are made.

Access full article

References

1. Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC - Statement by the Commission, OJ 2003 L 156/17.
2. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), ratified by the EC in Council Decision 2005/370/EC.
3. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1995, Judgment of the Court of 11 August 1995. Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. Failure to fulfil obligations - Failure by public authorities to apply a directive which has not yet been transposed - Council Directaiave 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment - Großkrotzenburg thermal power station - Consent for the construction of a new block (Case C-431/92).
4. C-131/94 Commission v. Belgium (removed from the register).
5. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1996. Judgment of the Court of 24 October 1996.Aannemersbedrijf P.K. Kraaijeveld BV e.a. v Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Raad van State - Netherlands. Environment - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects (Case C-72/95).
6. Kramer, L.: EC Environmental Law, 5th edition, London, Sweet&Maxwell, 2003.
7. Jans, J.H.: European Environmental Law, 2nd edition, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, pp. 323-324.
8. Decision 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, OJ 1996 L 228/1.
9. Jans, J.H.: European Environmental Law, 2nd edition, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, pp. 323-324.
10. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1999, Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 1999. Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. 
    Environment - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain public or private projects - Setting of thresholds (Case C-392/96).
11. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1999, Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 September 1999. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Others v Autonome Provinz Bozen and Others. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgericht, Autonome Sektion für die Provinz Bozen - Italy. Environment - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects (Case C-435/97).
12. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2004, Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 January 2004.The Queen, on the application of Delena Wells v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom. Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - National measure granting consent for mining operations without an environmental impact assessment being carried out - Direct effect of directives - Triangular situation (Case C-201/02.).
13. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2004, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2004. Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment - Incorrect implementation - Project for a Valencia-Tarragona railway line, Las Palmas-Oropesa section (Case C-227/01).
14. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ 1992 L 206/7.
15. Convention on access to information, public participation in decision‐making and access to justice in environmental matters, OJ 2005 L 124/4.
16. United Nations, 1991, Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context.
17. The Relationship between the EIA and SEA Directives: Final Report to the European Commission, Imperial College London Consultants, August 2005.