Skip to main content Skip to page footer
elni logo elni logo

Amended Comitology Decision strengthens Position of European Parliament

Gerhard Roller

elni Review 2007, Issue 1,  pp. 39-40. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2007.007

Comitology committees are characterized by the fact that they are established by a basic instrument by the Council; they operate according to a specific legal procedure and deliver opinions on draft implementing measures submitted to them by the Commission. Members of the committees are civil servants of the Member States. The overall number of committees has risen significantly in recent years. Today, the environmental sector has become one of the most prominent fields in terms of the application of comitology decisions. After intensive debate and negotiation, an amended Comitology Decision came into force on 23 July 2006. The enacted Decision differs considerably from the Commission’s original proposal, as well as from the modified Commission’s proposal of 2004. According to the author, the amendment that was ultimately adopted has to be considered as a substantial step forward in putting the Parliament on an “equal footing” with the Council in the comitology procedure. The Parliament now disposes of a real veto right, at least in cases of “excès de pouvoir”.

Access full article

References

  1. Report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, 3 July 2006, on the draft Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (10126/1/2006 – C6-0190/2006 – 2002/0298(CNS)).
  2. Council Decision of 17 July 2006 amending decision 1999/468/EC, laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, (2006/512/EC), OJ 1006 L 200/11.
  3. Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Decision, amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, COM(2002) 719final.
  4. G. Roller, Komitologie und Demokratieprinzip, Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 3/2003, p. 249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2003-3-249.
  5. Commission of the European Communities, 2004, Amended proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, COM (2004) 324 final.
  6. G. Roller, Comitology in Environmental Policy, in: H. Hofmann/A. Türk, EU Administrative Governance, (Edward Elger, Cheltenham, 2006), p. 115.
  7. K. Lenaerts/A. Verhoeven, Towards a legal framework for executive rule-making in the EU? The contribution of the new comitology decision, Common Market Law Review 2000.
  8. C. Mensching, Der neue Komitologie-Beschluss des Rates, EuZW 2000.
  9. J.-L. Sauron, Comitologie: comment sortir de la confusion? Revue du Marché unique  européen, 1-1999.
  10. Court of Justice of the European Union, 1970, Judgment of the Court of 17 December 1970. Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel v Köster and Berodt & Co. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Hessischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Germany (Case 25-70).
  11. K. St. C. Bradley, Comitology and the Courts: tales of the unexpected, in: H. Hofmann/A. Türk, EU Administrative Governance, (Edward Elger, Cheltenham 2006), pp. 417-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845429966.00024.
  12. Committee on Constitutional Affairs, 3 July 2006, Report on the draft Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (10126/1/2006 – C6-0190/2006 – 2002/0298(CNS)), Document A6-0236/2006.
  13. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2003, Judgment of the Court of 21 January 2003. Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Comitology - Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission - Criteria for choosing between the different procedures for adopting implementing measures - Effects - Obligation to state reasons - Annulment in part of Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE). (Case C-378/00).