Skip to main content

Locus standi for environmental NGOs in Germany: The (non)implementation of the Aarhus Convention by the ‘Umweltrechtsbehelfsgesetz’ - Some critical remarks

Gerhard Roller

elni Review 2010, Issue 1,  pp. 30-35. https://doi.org/10.46850/elni.2010.005

Access to justice for environmental NGOs in Germany is a long and troublesome story. Since the appearance of a widespread movement of environmental associations in the 1970s, there has been a struggle for the introduction of an association lawsuit in German environmental law. The campaign to open the courtrooms’ doors had been observed with scepticism by politicians and traditional lawyers, sometimes accompanied by hostility. There was deep concern that fanatic members of NGOs would bring ‘a spate of querulous actions, and the courts would be inundated by environmental litigation.’ It is therefore not surprising that the German government was not too enthusiastic about the Aarhus Convention. This of course did not hinder German representatives actively influencing the wording of the Convention in a restrictive sense during the negotiations. But even then we had to wait until a Red-Green coalition came into effect in 1998 before the Convention was signed. With the coming into force of the Aarhus Convention and the related EC directives transposing this Convention into community law, the Member States are obliged to transpose the Convention into national law. As a consequence, the traditional German concepts which confer only very limited access to the courts on NGOs have to undergo fundamental revision. However, it seems that the German legislator is not yet ready for this change. For the present, the Environmental Appeal Act that entered into force on 15 December 2006 is the latest chapter in this story – but certainly not the last.

Access full article

References

  1. Ormond, T., Environmental Group Actions in West Germany, in: Führ/Roller, Participation and Litigation Rights of Environmental Associations in Europe, ELNI Studies no. 1 Frankfurt a. M. 1991.
  2. Koch, H.J., Die Verbandsklage im Umweltrecht, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht vol. 4, 2007, p. 369 et seq. (370-372).
  3. Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU), Access to Justice in Environmental Matters: The Crucial Role of Legal Standing for Non-Governmental Organisations. Statement, February 2005.
  4. Dette, B., Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, A Fundamental Democratic Right, in: M. Onida (ed.) Europe and the Environment, Legal Essays in Honour of Ludwig Krämer, Groningen 2004.
  5. Jendroska, J., Public Information and Participation in EC Environmental Law, R. Macrory (ed.), Reflections on 30 years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2006.
  6. Roller, G., Environmental Law Principles in the Jurisprudence of German Administrative Courts, in: M. Sheridan & L. Lavrysen (eds.), Environmental Law Principles in Practice, Brussels 2002, p. 164
  7. Steinberg, R., Judicial Review of Environmentally-related Administrative Decision-making, Tel Aviv University Studies in Law, Vol. II, 1992, p. 61.
  8. Ormond, T., ‘Access to Justice’ for Environmental NGOs in the European Union, in: S. Deimann/B. Dyssli (eds.), Environmental Rights, London 1995, p. 71 et seq.
  9. Führ/Gebers/Ormond/Roller, ‘Access to Justice’: Legal Standing for Environmental Associations in the European Union, in: Robinson/Dunkley (eds.), Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law, London 1995, p. 71 et seq.
  10. Dross, M., Germany, in: de Sadeleer/Roller/Dross, Access to Justice in Environmental Matters and the Role of NGO’s, Empirical Findings and Legal Appraisal, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2005, p. 75.
  11. Prieur, M., Complaints and appeals in the area of environment in the member states of the European Union, European Council on Environmental Law, study for the Commission of the European Community DG XI, March 1998.
  12. Ebbesson, J., (ed.), Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the EU, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London New York 2002, with a contribution from Eckhard Rehbinder concerning Germany, p. 248.
  13. Epiney & Sollberger, Zugang zu Gerichten und gerichtliche Kontrolle im Umweltrecht, Berichte 1/02 des Umweltbundesamtes (ed.), Berlin 2002.
  14. Deimann, S. & Dyssli, B., (eds.), Environmental Rights, Cameron May, London 1995.
  15. De Sadeleer/Roller/Dross, Access to Justice in Environmental Matters and the Role of NGO’s, Empirical Findings and Legal Appraisal, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2005.
  16. Philipp, B. Das Verbandsbeteiligungs- und Verbandsklagerecht der anerkannten Natur- und Umweltschutzverbände in Deutschland, ed. UfU e.V., Berlin 1988.
  17. Bizer, Ormond & Riedel, Die Verbandsklage im Naturschutzrecht, Taunusstein 1990.
  18. Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC, OJ 2003 L 41/26.
  19. Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC - Statement by the Commission, OJ 2003 L 156/17.
  20. Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, OJ 1996 L 257/6.
  21. Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessments of the effects of certain private and public projects on the environment, OJ 1985 175/40.
  22. Council Directive 96/61/EEC of 26 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, OJ 1996 L 257/26.
  23. Commission of the European Communities, 1993, Report from the Commission of the Implementation of Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment and Annexes for the Member States. COM (93) 28 final .
  24. Kment, M., Das neue Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz und seine Bedeutung für das UVPG, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Vol. 3 (2007).
  25. Ewer, W., Ausgewählte Rechtsanwendungsfragen des Entwurfs für ein Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Vol. 3 (2007), p. 272
  26. Bunge T., Rechtsschutz bei der UVP nach der Richtlinine 2003/35/EG, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, vol. 3 (2004), p 143.
  27. Schlacke, S., Rechtsschutz durch Verbandsklage, Natur und Recht, Vol. 10 (2004), 631.
  28. Louis, H.W., Die Übergangsregelungen für das Verbandsklagerecht nach den §§ 61, 69 Abs. 7 BNatSchG vor dem Hintergrund der europarechtlichen Klagerechte für Umweltverbände auf Grund der Änderungen der IVU- und der UVP-Richtlinien zur Umsetzung des Aarhus-Übereinkommens, Natur und Recht, Vol. 5 (2004), p. 290. DOI:
  29. Von Danwitz, Th., Aarhus-Konvention: Umweltinformation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Zugang zu den Gerichten, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht Vol. 3 (2004), p. 279.
  30. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, the Aarhus convention: an implementation guide, prepared by Stephen Stec and Susan Casey-Lefkowitz in collaboration with Jerzy Jendroska, (New York and Geneva 2000).
  31. Dette, B., Access to Justice in Environmental Matters: the Aarhus Convention and Legislative Initiatives for its implementation, in: Ormond/Führ/Barth (eds.), Environmental Law and Policy at the Turn to the 21st Century, Liber amicorum Betty Gebers, (Berlin 2006), p. 63 (at 77 et seq.).
  32. BGBl. I 2006 of 14 December 2006, p. 2816.
  33. Gellermann, M., Europäisierte Klagerechte anerkannter Umweltverbände, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Vol. 1 (2006), p. 7.
  34. Schmidt, A. & Kremer, P., Das Umweltrechtsbehelfsgesetz und der `weite Zugang zu Gerichten´, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht vol. 2 (2007), pp. 60-62.
  35. Jahns-Böhm, J., From Combating Air Pollution to an Integrated Pollution Prevention, in: Gebers/Robesin, Licensing Procedures for Industrial Plants and the Influence of EC-Directives, ELNI-Studies No. 3, Frankfurt a. M. 1993, p. 81 et seq.
  36. BVerwGE 69, 37 – Heidelberger Heizkraftwerk = NVwZ 1983.
  37. VGH (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) Mannheim, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht - Rechtsprechungsreport 1995, p. 639f (on p. 644).
  38. K. Hansmann, TA Luft, (2004) 65.
  39. Oberverwaltungsgericht Münster, 5.3.2009, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, (7-8) 2009, p. 380.
  40. Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, OJ 2004 L 143/56.
  41. Winter, G., J.H. Jans, R. Macrory & L. Krämer, Weithing up the EC Environmental Liability Directive, Journal of Environmental Law 20:2 (2008), p. 163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn013.
  42. Roller, G., Environmental Liability, in: Macrory (ed.), Reflections on 30 years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2006, p. 127.
  43. German Advisory Council, SRU in 2007: Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU), Umweltverwaltungen unter Reformdruck, Sondergutachten, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin 2007.